Archive for the ‘shopping’ Category

Help Your Kids Think Outside the Box by Throwing it Out (GeekDad Wayback Machine)

Friday, June 4th, 2010
Photo By Jeanette Giancaspro

Photo By Jeanette Giancaspro

In my house we have a spot for errant Lego called “The Lego Lost and Found box”. In that box there are leftover Technic Pieces, Gears, Bricks and those little translucent caps. Recently I’ve tossed in a handful of Erector Set pieces and some LED’s will soon follow.

The box serves two purposes, the first one being the obvious. When my son yells, “I’m missing this piece,” I have a pre-programmed answer for him. The second purpose is one of my daughter’s favorite uses if the box. Whenever she’s looking for some building fun, she dumps the box on the floor, sits down amongst the pieces and lets her imagination take over. Sometimes she has an idea, such as the “Death Bot” pictured here. Other times she just puts pieces together in an abstract sculpture. Sometimes I’m called in as a consultant to handle an engineering problem or attend a design meeting, but the final creation is all hers.

So many toys these days have a limited range of play and few options for taking them beyond their intended use. I’ve heard many times from parents and kids to “Just build it the way it’s supposed to be!” The beauty of The Lego Lost and Found Box is there’s no picture on the box.

So if you want to help your kids think out of the box, give them a box. A box of random bricks, gears and hardware leftovers. Then let their imaginations take over.

[This post originally ran in June, 2009]

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Down With The Murse! Try a Wise-Walker Instead

Monday, May 3rd, 2010
Nomadic Wise-Walker Multi Compartment Day Pack in Navy (image from jetpens.com)

Nomadic Wise-Walker Multi Compartment Day Pack in Navy (image from jetpens.com)

If your daily commute includes lugging a range of devices and you’re tired of hauling around a messenger bag or a big backpack that you’ve re-purposed for the job, the Wise-Walker, a compact urban bag imported from Japan might be the answer. It could also prove useful for those day trips with the kids, with all the compartments you need to keep the granola bars from gumming up the DS and the water bottle from leaking on your camera.

As a guy who compulsively carries a lot of gear everywhere I go -whether it’s out for coffee, to the mall, shopping downtown or on excursions with the kids to the zoo or amusement park- I have two main standbys when it comes to organizing and carrying said gear. For more formal occasions or when a laptop is part of the cargo, I go with a leather messenger bag (aka the manpurse or “murse“); for everything else, I turn to a tried and true LLBean day pack I’ve relied on for the past few years. Both have their advantages and disadvantages. The messenger bag is nicely compartmentalized and has room for a padded laptop sleeve but it has limited overall capacity, can only be carried by its handle or shoulder strap and is not a good thing to be sporting in rain. The day pack holds quite a bit, but it’s aimed more at volume and athletic endeavors. For example, through elastic pockets designed to hold bottles, a built-in hydration sleeve and plenty of loops to secure bottles with grommets, I can easily carry enough water to keep the family going for a day of tromping around. However, the big storage compartments make it difficult to separate out smaller items like business cards, memory cards, iPods, pens, etc…

Lily from JetPens (importers of cool Japanese pens and stationery) sent me one their new Nomadic Wise-Walker day packs and I think I’ve found the missing link. When I received the bag, the first thing I did was give it a quick once over to see how many compartments I could find without looking at the instructions. I came up with a dozen and after consulting the instructions, it turns out that I missed a few. The contents of Nathan Barry’s Drawer of Redundant Technology would easily fit in this bag, and each item would likely have its own compartment to boot.

Where the LL Bean bag is constructed to look rugged and adventurous, the Nomadic Wise Walker is much more toned down. This is probably a good thing in an urban environment where you don’t necessarily want to be calling undue attention to yourself and it blends readily with casual or business wear. The one I received was a rather handsome navy blue, made of rugged and waterproofed ripstop nylon (complete with fabric flaps over zippers to prevent water penetration). Zippers and hardware are metal which should be more durable than cheaper plastic versions and the zippers on the main pocket include holes to allow the compartment to be secured with a small padlock if you so choose. Assuming a potential thief isn’t inclined to grab the whole bag or packing a sharp instrument, that could be a useful feature. Open the bag up, and the compartment linings are bright orange, adding a flash of color and making it much easier to find things, even in low light. It’s compact at 15 inches tall by 9.5 inches wide and weighs only 24 oz.

At first glance, I was concerned that the compact size wouldn’t fit my frame. I usually wear a size 48 coat and sometimes run into problems with fitting, but the Wise-Walker easily adjusted to fit comfortably. The straps and back are sufficiently padded to be quite comfortable. A nice touch is a hidden pocket directly against the back, secured by a zipper, that can be used to hide valuables such as your wallet. While nothing is entirely safe from a talented pickpocket, the fact that the pocket is directly against your back where you can more easily feel anything being removed (as opposed to being isolated on the outside of the bag) and accessible only at your side, makes it more secure. One caveat on this feature: while it’s intended for the wearer to be able to access the contents by reaching back without removing the bag, I couldn’t manage it without taking the bag off. I tried it with someone smaller and they had no problem, so I suspect there’s some combination of flexibility/shoulder width ratio at work. There are also handy little pockets at the bottom of the shoulder straps that can be used to stash transit tokens or coins.Two external mesh pockets hold 16 ounce water bottles and, while the compartments themselves are not padded or overly large, they will accommodate netbooks or small laptops -I was able to easily fit my MacBook Air in its padded sleeve without a problem.

Suggestions For Stuffing The Wise-Walker (image from jetpens.com)

Suggestions For Stuffing The Wise-Walker (image from jetpens.com)

The instructions reference a zipper pocket for an MD Walkman, but I think we can safely call that iPod storage. One minor oversight is a lack of headphone cable routing for the iPhone (or MD Walkman); it’s no big deal to leave the pocket open a smidge for the cable, but doing so is a pretty big advertisement of what you have back there. A side-mounted pocket with cable routing would have been better. In general, though, there are more than enough pockets and compartments to keep any urban commuter or day walker completely organized, with space designed to accept a raincoat, lunch bag, pens, cellphones, books and whatever else you might carry around on a daily basis. Lily mentioned she’s using one as a diaper bag and I could see where that would work quite well. Overall, the Wise-Walker is an intelligently designed and attractive urban bag.

Nomadic CB-01 Wise-Walker Multi Compartment Day Pack: $88.00
Available in Gray, Black and Navy from jetpens.com

Wired: Lightweight, compact, waterproof, stylish, quality construction with reinforced seams and no loose threads, comfortable, more storage than you’ll know what to do with, searching for hidden additional compartments is a great way to kill time.

Tired: Would be nice to have a side-mounted (i.e., more secure) iPod pocket with headphone cable routing, not suitable for carrying full-sized laptops.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The Zombie Combat Manual: A Must Read For Geek Parents

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

If you spend as much time as I do worrying about the coming zombie apocalypse (and let’s face it, you’re reading GeekDad so in all likelihood it’s at least in the back of your mind), clear some space on your bookshelf beside Dr.Spock and pick up a copy of The Zombie Combat Manual: A Guide To Fighting The Living Dead, by Roger Ma. Not only will you learn how to defend yourself against the shuffling menace, but Ma dedicates a chapter of his book to the critical topic of protecting your children during a zombie outbreak.

Book cover copyright the Penguin Group

Book cover copyright the Penguin Group

The Zombie Combat Manual was a great read that I completed in only three sessions -not because it’s shallow or particularly short (for the record, it clocks in at around 300 pages), but because it was entertaining and quick paced. Author Roger Ma presents the book as a combat manual that focuses on hand-to-hand fighting or small weapons use, based on the premise that while guns may be more effective at a distance, Murphy’s Law dictates that at some point during an outbreak, you’ll be facing a zombie without the benefit of a firearm. And survival favors the prepared. Covering everything from an effective exercise regimen to zombie vulnerabilities, weapon selection, defensive equipment, child protection and even the reality of decapitation during combat (it’s much harder to achieve than you might think based on what you see in movies), the book is also sprinkled with sections where survivors recount their experiences. Underestimation of the undead is a common theme in these stories. Gamers will appreciate the way weapons are presented as different classes, each complete with a ranking of effectiveness against zombies, an expected lifespan (measured in zombie engagements), skill level required, availability and cost. Using this system, a common screwdriver, for example is considered to be highly effective, good for 100+ zombie engagements, requires a very high skill level (best results are achieved when close enough to drive the blade up from under the zombie’s chin), but it’s very common and very inexpensive.

Since this is GeekDad, a few words on the Child Protection chapter might be in order. First of all, in case the talk of decapitation and driving screwdrivers into zombie skulls wasn’t a strong enough clue, let me point out that the book itself is not for your kids. Besides the graphic description of zombie combat, it’s complete with black and white illustrations that effectively showcase the results of different attacks, so keep the book to yourselves. Among Ma’s advice to parents: always have a stroller on hand (because the energy needed to carry a child to escape a zombie outbreak would be better spent on foraging, security and defense), avoid close-quarters fighting if you’re carrying a child strapped to you in a carrier (duh!) and, as parents, it’s important to inform kids about the zombie life cycle so they know to run should their guardian be turned. It’s not a pleasant topic, but it’s important that they understand the dangers the living dead present. And I thought “stranger danger” was a tough conversation…

In all seriousness, The Zombie Combat Manual succeeds because it doesn’t try to rehash everything there is to know about zombies, it concentrates on hand-to-hand combat survival techniques. There are just enough encounter sections to keep things moving and Ma’s sense of humor prevents the book from getting too dark, despite the often gruesome subject matter. Y.N. Heller’s illustrations are the prefect accompaniment, adding an element of gory camp to the equation. The funny thing is, I was reading a novel during the same session that prominently features the undead (Cherie Priest’s Boneshaker), and found myself wincing when her characters did the “wrong thing” (according to the combat manual) when encountering rotters; I guess I did pick up on the techniques. Check out the Zombie Combat Club website for more tips, pointers and hints.

Currently selling for $9.99 on Amazon, the book could be the best ten bucks you spend on zombie preparation. If you like the cool “Zombie Combat Club” emblem on the book cover, T-shirts and decals sporting the logo  are available from Zazzle. Roger sent me one of the decals and I can’t decide where to put it (kind of a throwback to grade one and the whole “sticker hoarding” issue), so I’m thinking of just ordering a shirt so I don’t have to make the decision.

Cool decal...    Image from zombiecombatclub.com

Cool decal... Image from zombiecombatclub.com

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

3-D TV: The Future Is Here For Now

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

As the momentum to replace those ancient 50 inch, 1080P, 240 MHz LED-backlit LCD TVs littering family rooms picks up, GeekDad had the opportunity to spend some time trying out the latest 3-D capable set from a leading electronics manufacturer. Afterward, we had a few moments to speak with Gil Flop, a company representative, as he demonstrated the latest in the company’s line-up.

Photo by Wheany (Jan-Erik Finnberg), used under a Creative Commons License

Photo by Wheany (Jan-Erik Finnberg), used under a Creative Commons License

“We’re introducing a new model for $4,000 that includes not only 3-D capability, but has a handy storage pocket built in to the side of the unit.  It has a built in IR sensor that opens a motorized door giving access to the storage pocket at the wave of a hand. Very cool.”

When asked if the pocket was meant to store remotes, Flop rolled his eyes. “We’re assuming that consumers would like to keep their 3-D movies handy and separate from their big library of inferior 2-D versions,” he explained. “Of course the 3-D content available is pretty limited at the moment so we don’t need much space, but we already envision future models with screens as big as 70 inches and a 3-D media storage bin that’s correspondingly larger, possibly capable of stashing up to six discs.”

We asked if the current 3-D craze was in danger of petering out, similar to the public shrug that marked the 3-D movie experience in the 1950s.

“Any suggestion that today’s 3-D experience is anything like that of the 50’s is ridiculous,” scoffs Flop. “The 3-D glasses back then were made of cardboard for crying out loud and they cost a dime. Today’s models are the highest quality plastic and cost $150 a pair.”

Current 3-D TVs can be flipped to 2-D mode for viewing regular content, but if a 3-D movie is being played, everyone in the room has to enjoy the 3-D experience. We asked Flop to comment on the needs of viewers who currently wear prescription glasses, who would be forced to choose between blurry 3-D or crystal clear garbage.

“What am I, your optometrist? Seriously, though, I think you should invest in contacts. Your glasses look kind of goofy anyway, if you don’t mind my saying so.”

When asked if it seemed unreasonable to expect a family of four to spend $600 on 3-D glasses to enjoy their home theater experience, Flop laughed. “$600? To start, I guess. I think you need to check your numbers,” he said. “I’m assuming that two of those people are children, so you’ll need to invest in kid-sized 3-D glasses at first, then buy replacements as the kids get older and their heads grow. Do you know how fast kids go through shoes? Wow, if we made glasses that went up in incremental sizes like shoes…” At this point the interview was cut short as Jones made a call to his product manager.

Wired: 3-D is 1-D (and $2,000) better than 2-D.

Tired: Watching the same 3-D movie repeatedly gets old really fast, popping Gravol while watching TV is less satisfying than popcorn, lack of John Lennon frame 3-D glasses limits appeal in many markets, guests are out of luck unless they bring their own (compatible) glasses, prospect of 3-D commercials for Imodium is terrifying.

APRIL FOOLS!

Samsung’s Red Robotic Time-Saver Sucks in a Good Way

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010
Image from Samsung.ca

Image from Samsung.ca

Samsung’s VCRR8830T1R (aka the Tango) is the South Korean manufacturer’s latest entry in the growing robotic vacuum market. Does it do the job? I took the plunge and bought one a few weeks ago and so far, I’d give the Samsung a thumbs up.

As a work from home dad with three kids aged 10 and under, I’m always looking for time savers that help me wring the most out of those two hour productivity chunks squeezed between the getting ready for school rush, the kids coming home for lunch and then the chaos that ensues once they return home at 3:30. One of the ways to maximize the time I have available to write is to cut the time it takes to keep the house clean. Between kids, a pair of large and furry dogs and two cats thrown in the mix, vacuuming is something I have to do at least daily, if not twice a day, especially on the main floor which is covered with laminate that quite effectively showcases all foreign substances. I just can’t focus with tumbleweeds of dog hair rolling around my feet or drifting through the air as they ride the current over a floor register. Automating that process would go a long way toward buying me time. Plus, as GeekDad Editor Emeritus Chris Anderson chronicled a few years back, robotic vacuum cleaners have great entertainment potential.

The stores around here are full of discounted earlier generation Roombas and even the current models are often on sale, but I’d read accounts of Roombas having a short life span and failing to return to their dock reliably (I don’t want to be a robot babysitter), so I started looking for alternatives. I also had concerns about the cleaning algorithm the Roomba employed and how random movement would likely end up spooking the dogs, making for a very noisy, counter-productive experience. Which is how I stumbled across the Samsung Tango.

Besides rocking a sleek look and funky red color scheme (I am a bit of a sucker for aesthetics, even in an appliance), the Samsung uses a different approach to cleaning. An upward facing camera (taking shots at 30 fps), captures ceiling images to help build a map of the house as it moves around, which the robot reportedly then memorizes. It cleans by following a methodical pattern based on the house layout -no random action, it makes its way deliberately from one end of the floor to the other, making minor adjustments if it runs into an object that wasn’t there before. While there was some initial barking during its maiden trip around the house, the dogs quickly learned to ignore the Samsung. Because it’s not zigzagging around randomly, the dogs chill out while it works its way across the floor, then take up position where it started and have a nap while it completes its cleaning cycle. This predictable approach makes it much easier for me to putter around while the vacuum’s doing its thing too; no worries about it sneaking up and ramming me or me stepping on it. The round shape makes cleaning corners a challenge (a revolving whisk helps this shortcoming somewhat), it can’t get under our sofas and it doesn’t attempt to navigate the 28 legged wooden tangle that is the dining room table and chairs, but raised decorative floor register covers, footstools and transitioning between area rugs and hard flooring have proved no problem. It always finds its way back to the docking station without assistance and the only time it ever got stuck was when it wedged between a pair of the aforementioned dining chairs a few days in to its residence. There’s been no repeat of that incident, although I don’t know if that’s because it now avoids the tangle or I’ve just been lucky. The dirt collection bin can be easily removed to empty, but the Samsung has a handy access port on top that allows you to save time by vacuuming out the vacuum. And you will still be manually vacuuming; I didn’t kid myself that this was going to replace manually vacuuming and it doesn’t.  But it keeps things tidy enough that instead of having to haul out my Dyson on a daily basis, I can do so a few times a week, primarily to get the stuff under furniture, along baseboards, beneath the dining table and trapped in corners.

The main floor of our house is open concept, consisting of the kitchen, dining area, front entrance foyer and living room area. There are two sets of stairs leading down and one going up; up is obviously not a concern, but I was a little worried about the stairs leading down. I didn’t want to have to set up a virtual wall at the top of the stairway as that’s just something for the kids to move when I’m not looking or the dogs to chew up. For the first three or four tours, I sat at the bottom of the stairs as the vacuum approached, ready to catch it if the worst should happen. It was a little disconcerting because the “cliff sensors” are located underneath the device, so it has to literally stick its nose over the precipice as though it were going to take the plunge. It always backed off, rotated and progressed a few inches parallel to the stairs and tried again, then gave up and moved on. After a few weeks, I’m pretty comfortable that it’s safe, although I take care to make sure those cliff sensors don’t get dirty.

In terms of real life battery performance, I’ve been seeing about 1.5 hours worth of vacuuming on a charge (sufficient to vacuum the main floor twice over), with a full recharge of the Ni-MH batteries taking only two hours. If it runs low on power during a cycle, it returns to the base, charges up, then automatically goes back to where it left off and resumes cleaning.

As a kid friendly safety feature, the Tango automatically shuts down if lifted from the ground. It’s far quieter than my Dyson vacuum and, while not as powerful either, it picks up pet fur, hair, crumbs, sand and dirt like a trooper. Samsung claims the rotating brush is designed to improve pet hair performance and prevent tangling and so far I have no complaints in that regard. The only issue I’ve found so far is that the axle of the steering wheel is prone to having dog fur wrapped around it, which needs to be pulled off or presumably it will eventually impede navigation.

In terms of entertainment value, we only have one, so no LEGO jousting at this point, but you can manually drive the vacuum like an R/C car with the remote control and the synthesized female voice that announces various events like recharging is kind of cool (you can turn the voice announcements off if they wear thin). Only time will tell if the Samsung will be reliable, but the build quality certainly seems solid.

I haven’t seen the VCRR8830T1R for sale in the US; it’s not on Samsung’s US web site either. However, you can pick one up from a Canadian retailer if you’re doing any cross-border shopping and there’s always eBay.  I paid $450 for mine at FutureShop (in Canada) and Samsung has actually been giving them away with some refrigerators here as a promotion. Maybe Samsung is testing the waters in the Great White North before launching in the US, but I suspect Roomba is going to face additional competition in the robotic vacuum market sooner rather than later.

Samsung VCRR8830T1R robotic vacuum cleaner
MSRP: ? (Selling for $449.00 in Canada)
Includes: Extra HEPA filter, charging base station, remote control, cleaning brush, 2 iKeepers (virtual gates)

Wired: attractive, relatively quiet, does a good job of picking up everything from pet hair to sand, automatically (and reliably) returns to base for recharging, thoroughly cleans main traffic areas, easy to empty collection bin, recharges quickly, handles carpet/hard floor transitions, collision sensors work well and bumpers prevented any mishaps.
Tired: relatively expensive, steering wheel axle prone to getting tangled in hair, needs help tidying up corners and along baseboards.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Kids Threadless T-Shirts Are All Ten Bucks Til Saturday Morning

Friday, March 19th, 2010

I'm stoked that Threadless, everyone's favorite crowdsourcing t-shirt cult, is celebrating their 10th anniversary by selling all T's, including kids' for just $10 each. [Order by Saturday morning, 3/20 at 10AM CT!]

But I'm also kind of paralyzed by the choice. After surfing through 9 of 12 pages of kid shirts, the hundreds of unique designs have all become a hip, quirky, witty blur.

threadless_beat_it.jpg

Unless someone stops me with some better suggestions, I'm going to end up with Adam Benjamin White's "Beat It." Which is awesome as a concept, but which I'd probably regret, either because the kid doesn't wear it, or because she does.

OK, maybe this one.

Beat It and all Threadless T-shirts are $10 at the moment [threadless.com via threadless pr]

Six Months With An eBook Reader: Yeah or Meh?

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

It’s nearly six months since I first took the plunge and entered the world of e-Books and e-Book readers in a big way. As an avid reader and book collector (some would say hoarder), has the digital plunge been a game changer, or just another meh experience?

Photo by Brad Moon

Photo by Brad Moon

I’m of that age where making digital transitions has been a way of life. Many of the toys and board games I played with as a young child largely gave way to video game consoles. I had a thermal electric typewriter (kind of a hybrid phase between standalone electric typewriters and standalone computer printers) before saving enough allowance and birthday money for a VIC-20. I was (and remain) a music geek, amassing hundreds of vinyl LPs as a teen, each preserved in a plastic sleeve and alphabetized in a series of milk crates; my first CD purchase was an imported Ultravox disc that seemed impossibly thin, incredibly expensive, yet compellingly perfect. It was CDs all the way from then on. My collection of slowly degrading VHS movies was dutifully upgraded to DVD versions and a select few have been upgraded once again to Blu-Ray (yes, for the most part the MPAA loves me). Film cameras and photo albums gave way to massive digital photo libraries (with select key photos still printed in archival hard copy). And over the past four or five years, all those digital bits -the CDs, photos and DVDs- have themselves been centralized and stored in a digital library that currently consumes 3 Terabytes of external hard drive space. The Walkmans and boomboxes have given way to a drawer full of iPods and various speaker docking systems. The CRT TVs held on through the early years of plasma, DLP and then LCD, but were eventually replaced in one fell swoop with digital LCD versions. My book collection was the last stand for old school media.

Of all my physical media collections, books have probably been the most consistently acquired through my life and as a result, the most space intensive. I may have stopped buying CDs for a few years when the kids were first born, but books have always been a necessity and they’re stacked on nine full height bookshelves. Like anything else I collected, it was important to keep my books pristine -no folded corners, reading on beaches or bending of spines. I have lent out novels to friends, but I suspect they’re a little terrified of the process, kind of like the inspection one undergoes when returning a leased car. When I was a kid, I frequented my hometown library until I’d exhausted their science fiction, horror and fantasy sections at which point I concluded that waiting for the library to get around to acquiring a copy of a book I wanted was too annoying to bear and I turned to accumulating my own collection. Besides, library books always offended my sense of perfection -books that frequently changed hands quickly became battered and often contained surprises left behind by previous readers, anything from food crumbs to torn pages and other stuff we won’t delve into here.

Which brings me to eBooks. Others have written about their eBook thoughts and come out on the side of good old paper. To me, this has been just another in a long line of digital transitions and I’m emotionally detached. Admittedly, I am a bit of a technology and gadget nut and my first reaction once I had eBook readers in my hands to play with, was to focus on the capabilities of the devices. The version I eventually bought (a Sony Reader Pocket) was simply flat out cool to play around with. The thing is, while I was reading eBooks as a requirement for reviewing the hardware, I seamlessly transitioned to using an eBook reader as my primary reading method. Granted, with its aluminum tablet form factor, it didn’t have the same feel as a book and pushing a button instead of physically flipping a page was also different, but I quickly adjusted and it was once again all about the written word. My wife bought me a leather cover at Christmas that replicates the “book” feel somewhat, so even that difference is largely gone.

My reading habits have indeed changed and, if anything, I’m reading more than ever. The eBook reader I have is compact enough that it literally slips into a pocket, so I have it with me everywhere. I can read serially on the run -flipping between books as mood or need dictates- with hundreds of books in hand and no worries about searching to find and sling around the novels I want to have handy. I’m buying books just as frequently, but they’re eBooks. Digital, taking up no space and pristine forever (although I realize that “forever” is as limited as any digital storage method can be). Like the iTunes Store and other counterparts opened up the record labels’ back catalogs and resulted in the release of thousands of albums that, for years, had been available only in used record shops, books that were once out of print are finding their way into circulation again, in electronic format. At the other extreme, I used to wait for new releases to complete their hardcover run before taking the plunge and buying a paperback version, but now I buy the book on release, usually for the price I would have paid for the paperback. Granted, that pricing seems to be on quicksand at the moment, but even if it falters, I’m no worse off than before. My eBooks are backed up, so a hard drive or device failure doesn’t mean my copy is gone. I buy ePub versions so I’m not locked onto particular device (unlike a Kindle, for example). No-one else in the household has an eBook reader yet, but when they do, there’s no fighting over the same book -we can all read it at the same time, if so inclined. I’ve even borrowed books from the library for the first time in many years. I can log onto my local branch, check out (or put a hold) on the eBook I want and a pristine copy shows up. The downside to the library aspect is a lack of titles and the still compelling need to accumulate my own library, because who knows when I might feel the immediate need to re-read Dune for the umpteenth time.

And what about the iPad? Do I regret taking the plunge when Apple’s offering was hovering in the wings? Those who’ve been following GeekDad for a while likely realize I do like my Apple gear. However, despite my enthusiasm, I have a certain degree of restraint. For example, I’ve felt no need to replace my “aging” (1.5 year old) HTC smartphone with an iPhone, despite being an obvious candidate. My existing phone does its job quite well and my iPod Touch does its job very well; I see no compelling need to combine them. Despite having a “free pass” to buy an iPad when it becomes available (this earned by ceding the right to choose appliances to my wife during our kitchen reno), I think I’ll hold off. I want an eBook reader that I can carry around and read on the beach. I want a display that I can easily read in the daylight and a battery that lasts for weeks between charges. I read novels for the most part, and they’re black text on a white page, so color is moot, unless you count nice displays of the book’s cover. When I do take the plunge on an iPad, I may do some reading on it, but I can’t see the day when a tablet that’s too big to pocket, expensive enough to make me cringe if I accidentally dropped it, not the greatest for reading in daylight and with battery life measured in hour instead of days, becomes my daily go-to device for reading eBooks; eComics, sure, but that’s something for another day. The iPad may eventually replace my MacBook Air as the lightweight device I use to stay in touch and dabble at writing while I’m off camping, but only if/when Apple caves and allows multiple applications to run simultaneously.

My conclusion? Reading is all digital for me from now on. I feel very old-school when publishers send me dead tree books for review. I read them, but I’ve come to prefer the eBook experience. I’m still keeping my analog novels, but I suspect they’ll soon be doubled up on the bookshelves, freeing up room for other things. I sometimes look at those bookshelves and think of them as 30 square feet of floor space, or 160 cubic feet or so of storage space. If we lived in a McMansion or had fewer kids and animals running around the place, I might leave them alone, but as it is, every square foot of storage space is valuable.  If I upgrade my eBook reader, it will likely be when the rumored next generation of E Ink displays manages snappier performance and perhaps a slight increase in contrast, but color or a bigger screen are of little interest to me. One thing’s for sure, I can’t see the day when I downgrade back to paper. In a way, it’s sad to say goodbye to another holdover that’s served us well for centuries, but on the other hand, it’s all about the reading and eBooks offer a damned compelling path to the future.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

A Wall Mounted TV Is A Safe TV

Monday, January 25th, 2010
The lack of toys, videos and handprints on the walls say no kids in this house, but the TV is safely mounted.  Image: Peerless.com

The lack of toys, videos and handprints on the walls say no kids in this house, but the TV is safely mounted. Image: Peerless.com

Which would you rather have fall on your kid: a 36 inch screen, 236 pound Trinitron tube TV or a 40 inch screen, 43 pound Bravia LCD TV? The correct answer, of course, is neither. Unfortunately, it seems that many people have inadvertently opted for the second choice, with the number of children injured by falling televisions increasing despite the shrinking mass of today’s flat screen TVs.

Being hit by a television seldom ends well. While flat screens are much lighter than CRT models, the screen sizes keep growing, resulting in increased weight. Even a small flat screen is still a big slab of glass surrounded by sharp plastic and metal. Being hit by a TV can cause a range of injuries, including skull fractures, other fractures, bleeding in the brain, nasal obstructions, loss of facial nerve function and hearing loss. Sometimes injuries are severe enough to be fatal.

Our current obsession with thin has caused some problems with respect to safety. The most current published stats are from 2007, but during the 1990 to 2007 time frame -a period that marks the transition from bulky CRTs to relatively svelte flat screens- the number of children injured by toppling furniture rose 41 percent, with nearly half of the carnage caused by TVs. To put that in perspective, 17,000 children in the US had to be rushed to Emergency in 2007 after furniture fell on them, with half that number being TV victims. According to the US Consumer Product Safety Commission, seven people were killed by falling TVs in 2000, with the number rising to 23 deaths in 2006. Why should this be?

Much of the blame for the increase in injury rates lies in parents’ mistaken assumption that because a modern flat screen TV is so light compared to the massive tube TVs they grew up with, the danger of the set toppling over is correspondingly reduced. It’s a false sense of security. You may not have seen one recently, but a 40 inch tube TV commands respect. It’s not only massive and difficult to move on its own, but it has such a large footprint that it’s actually pretty stable, especially on the low bases these TVs were typically placed on. Nonetheless, parents pictured what 250 pounds of glass, plastic and metal would do if it landed on their kids, and they installed the safety  straps that secured the TV to a wall or the base it stood on. Flat screen TVs are large, thin objects that balance on a relatively thin base, making them extremely top heavy and prone to easily tipping if a child pulls on them. At that point it doesn’t matter that they “only” weigh 50 pounds, it’s still 50 pounds falling several feet onto a little person.

The good news is that it’s easy to prevent these sorts of accidents from happening. If you want to place a flat screen TV on a cabinet base, choose a base that’s low and stable, without drawers that might invite climbing. Fasten the cabinet to the wall behind it with a safety strap. When you place the TV on the cabinet, use straps to fasten it securely to the cabinet and, if possible, to the wall as well. The best option is one that also shows off the best of your flat screen; do away with the cabinet and wall mount it. Mounts are available that can hold your TV nearly flush against the wall for a clean look, while supporting several hundred pounds. Out of reach means far less likelihood of little hands being able to grab it, and this option takes the potential wobbliness of cabinets out of the equation altogether.

In the end, the most important piece of safety advice is to keep an eye on your kids and make sure they know they aren’t to climb on the TV; but because kids will be kids, make sure you also invest in some basic safety precautions.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Don’t Hate the Player, Hate the… GameStop?

Friday, November 13th, 2009
GameStop
Image via Wikipedia

We geeks have always had our easy targets for derision. Battlefield Earth. The Zune. Nokia’s N-Gage. Alaskan senator Ted Stevens. While we are likely the first to herald a critical success, we are equally quick to mock the epic failure. Such is our way.

Yet lately it seems as though our ire has been concentrated on one subject in particular: specialty retailer GameStop.

Just last week we nerdily chortled at a comic entitled “GameStop Survival Guide.” Therein an anonymous shopper provides eight simple steps to get in and out of the store with minimal hassle, including such jewels as “Arrive at GameStop for whatever inexplicable reason, usually related to laziness or proximity” and “Avoid the disease-ridden and quasi-functional demo units unless you want every child disease imaginable.”

It’s a wryly humorous set of observations, but I couldn’t help but notice that most don’t explicitly apply to GameStop alone. I’ve encountered unorganized mounds of shovelware at my local big-box, and I’ve had an equally pushy salesperson at an electronics retailer fruitlessly try to sell me a product warranty for a $20 alarm clock radio.

I’ll pause here to cop to a fairly unpopular opinion; I like GameStop. Not necessarily GameStop as a corporate entity, mind you, as I’m a worldly enough fellow to know it is only interested in me in as much as I represent a creature capable of buying stuff, but rather my local store. I’ve been going there for years, and I’m continually impressed by its product selection and helpful, personable salespeople. Moreover, I use sites like Cheap Ass Gamer to stay abreast of upcoming specials and trade-in deals, which typically stack with the extra 10% trade-in bonus/used item discount bundled with their “worthless magazine subscription.” As such, I tend to make out alright with little fuss.

Of course, I understand that my shopping experience may not be typical. Here on the internet, where criticism spreads like wildfire, GameStop is routinely lambasted on message boards for the exact reasons outlined in the aforementioned comic. It is said the stores are poorly stocked, incompetently staffed and crudely organized. And while, once again, these charges may also be levied at any other number of retailers, reports of GameStop employees selling gutted games as new are too numerous not to take into consideration.

Still, I find myself wondering if our unpleasant response to all things GameStop is equivalent to the chain’s transgressions.

Surely part of the problem – even beyond that of the much maligned “employee check-out policy” – relates directly to the giant’s merger with rival EB Games in 2005. This unceremonious union killed much of GameStop’s competition in the specialty games market, to the obvious detriment of the buying public.

This essentially means that, if you want to pick up a game no longer available at an easily accessible Target/Best Buy or any number of niche titles not typically stocked by more mainstream brick-and-mortars, GameStop becomes your only option. And while most customers are surely savvy enough to find and purchase such games online, it is an undeniable eventuality that, at some point, most gamers will have to huff it down to their local GameStop whether they want to or not.

So try not to take it too personally, GameStop. After all, familiarity breeds contempt.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Have Some Darwin-Inspired Fun with Charlie’s Playhouse

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009
(Image: Charlie's Playhouse)

(Image: Charlie's Playhouse)

Amy Cottrell of Geek Parenting posted this excellent post about Charlie’s Playhouse, a unique website selling toys and games inspired by Charles (”Charlie”) Darwin. You can even see her kids really getting into the Giant Timeline playmat. Charlie’s Playhouse looks to be a website full of high quality, truly educational toys that help your kids learn about evolution. I know what is going on my Christmas list!

The website also contains reviews of 89 different books on evolution for kids, and they have other resources for teachers and parents. It sounds like they only have a few products now, but will have many more in the future. Current products are geared toward kids 4 to 10. Future products will be for older and younger children, too.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]